Some of our team poses after our rushed presentation:

I have the privilege of presenting with a coalition of organizations at the City Council meeting Tuesday night, April 25, about a very important subject that will make a difference for the future of Vallejo youth if we can get it adopted.  Last year with the same coalition LGBTQ Minus Tobacco, Bay Area Community Resources and VibeSolano, we successfully got a Smokefree Multi-Unit Housing ordinance passed unanimously. 

After Proposition 31 prohibiting the sale of most tobacco flavors in California (including menthol) passed last November, it is important that we give some teeth to the new rules that are designed to protect our youth from access to very addictive nicotine products like cigarettes, cigarillos, vapes, cigars, hookah, etc. It’s shocking how many products every tobacco retailer in Vallejo I visited in January had available.  Most alarming was that some of the delivery devices looked like highlighters and USB drives to help youth hide their tobacco consumption from teachers and parents.  This is by design.

Some of you know that I’ve been volunteering against Big Tobacco since losing my father when he was fifty due to his smoking, not to mention other family members.  I encourage Vallejo residents to speak in favor of a TRL by doing one of the following if you are so inclined.

Here is a fact sheet on TRL’s:

I’m very proud to advocate for a Vallejo Tobacco Retail License (TRL) with a coalition of activists from LGBTQ Minus Tobacco, Bay Area Community Resources (BACR) and in my capacity as Co-Chair of Tobacco Free Solano (a program of the Solano Department of Health aka Vibe Solano).

We spoke at the VCUSD School Board meeting and they approved the Tobacco control resolution unanimously. Thank you school board member John Fox for agendizing us and allowing us to speak about this important issue. We are also honored with an opportunity to speak at Vallejo City Council on April 11 about the issue for our city.

Adjoa, Nefer, Tino, Tara, Amaya, me and Jimmy.

With the passage of Prop 31 to ban most flavored tobacco products in California, there is a call to action for local jurisdictions to enforce this new edict. Surveys our coalition did in January, weeks after the law went into effect, showed poor compliance among the 25 tobacco retailers in Vallejo. A Vallejo-specific TRL can accomplish this. TRL’s like the one hundreds of California jurisdictions have like Benicia, are revenue NEUTRAL. The funding from the retail license fees pays for gravely needed code enforcement resources, a bolstering which we know Vallejo could use. TRL’s that are written well can:

1. Mandate minimum pack sizes and prices to deter youth economically from becoming addicted.
2. Minimize the concentration of large numbers of tobacco retailers in poorer neighborhoods.
3. Cover the exceptions that Prop 31 made for some flavored tobacco products like hookah, some cigars, etc.
4. Mandate that pharmacies (which literally exist to sell medicine), stop selling tobacco products; and
5. Most importantly, enforce the law prohibiting the sale of any tobacco products to minors under 21 years of age, those minors of which Big Tobacco is targeting the most since virtually all new nicotine addicts are underage.

Vallejo youth deserve a chance at living their best lives without the fate of struggling health due to a difficult addiction to break.  Please endorse a Vallejo-specific TRL to make an impact.

I’ve been doing activism against Big Tobacco for years as a volunteer. This week I got my official title as a Co-Chair of Tobacco Free Solano (TFS), a program of Vibe Solano (the Solano County Department of Health). It’s a two-year volunteer term. The picture below is a little gift package they sent which is very sweet. Little do they know I have no intention of watching the Super Bowl, but instead will be going to a play for Black History Month in Pinole, which was directed by my friend.

I’ve been an activist against Big Tobacco since the early 1990’s when my father died at the age of fifty from his addiction to nicotine and it gave me a primary reason to go to law school.

Whenever I can I’m going to continue to fight against an industry that targets youth and queer people in particular with insidious tactics. Getting data by conducting surveys is one way I can do that. LGBTQ Minus Tobacco has given me great opportunities to fight locally, as I had been doing more regionally and nationally when I lived in New York City.

This event adjacent to the Farmers Market was organized by Solano AIDS Coalition.

County Supervisor Monica Brown even featured me in her Facebook feed!

I’ve been an activist against Big Tobacco since the early 1990’s when my father died at the age of fifty from his addiction to nicotine and it gave me a primary reason to go to law school.

Whenever I can I’m going to continue to fight against an industry that targets youth and queer people in particular with insidious tactics. Getting data by conducting surveys is one way I can do that. LGBTQ Minus Tobacco has given me great opportunities to fight locally, as I had been doing more regionally and nationally when I lived in New York City.

Updated May 5, 2022: The Times-Herald published my opinion piece on May 4, 2022. I spoke at the City Council meeting twice on this subject, after many meetings with a coalition of organizations including LGBTQ Minus Tobacco, and the Vice-Mayor Verder-Aliga (center), who we took a selfie with below, together with my fellow activist at Bay Area Community Resources, Calyn Kelley.

Video of our appearances in person a this City Council meeting is available here, together with the cannabis lobby’s plant:

My Op-Ed letter is here:

Smoke-free buildings with multiple residences are not only a public health issue, but a social justice issue. 

The Vallejo City Council is considering a smoke-free multi-unit housing ordinance, like many others that are well established in jurisdictions all around California and the Bay Area, including Benicia.  Vallejo’s youth deserve the same quality air in their homes as kids in other jurisdictions, particularly in the era of Covid and wildfires, when we have enough environmental challenges damaging the respiratory systems of our child and adult neighbors, many of whom are non-ambulatory, immune-compromised, underinsured or already have chronic conditions like asthma and lung infections. Some of these youth spoke compellingly at the last Vallejo City Council meeting.

Other speakers, some of whom represented cannabis businesses, expressed concern that not exempting cannabis in the ordinance would prohibit medical marijuana consumption in one’s home. They also claimed cannabis smoke was not harmful. The data shows otherwise.  See https://no-smoke.org/secondhand-marijuana-smoke-fact-sheet

As a strong supporter of cannabis decriminalization since the early 1990s, before I entered law school, I knew prohibition was futile.  I was also appalled at the imprisonment of so many for non-violent crimes. I have not changed my mind about that, even though I did also have a mission to fight Big Tobacco’s marketing to kids. Now, to fight this ordinance, lobbying groups insist that there is only one way to ingest cannabis, which is by igniting it.  I even heard arguments that it was just too expensive or an insufficient dosage to use edibles.  How about trying a new recipe?    

These ordinances are not about taking the right of recreational or medicinal cannabis away from those in multi-unit housing and it has nothing to do with single-family homes, despite the implication.  All that is being asked is that common courtesy for one’s adjoining neighbors be respected.  That means choosing options that don’t harm the health of others. In addition to edibles, there are cannabis inhalers that deliver a measured dose of medicine to the lungs without emitting smoke or a vape aerosol.

Smoke is smoke.  Up to 65% of air in an apartment can come from other units.  Carcinogenic smoke drifting through pipes and electric sockets, not to mention through windows from balconies is what this ordinance is really about.  To those who say “close a window” or “go somewhere else” when victims are sitting in their own homes, not everyone has the resources to pick up and move to a single-family dwelling on a moment’s notice when they are subjected to this kind of environment 8-24 hours a day.  Victims should not have the burden of proving the source of smoke.  This is all besides the fact that the use of combustible products contributes to countless fires that don’t just threaten one’s own home in the case of multi-unit housing, but all of those adjoined as well.  I grew up in apartments where my family had to evacuate buildings we lived in because of fires caused by smokers in adjoining units. So yes, this is personal.

Another great way to protect people from secondhand smoke is to reduce smoking rates altogether by preventing youth from getting addicted in the first place.  Holding retailers accountable who sell flavored tobacco and vape devices to kids would help immensely, as would raising minimum prices for tobacco.

It is wrong to allow smoking neighbors in connected units to compromise the health of others.  I urge Councilmembers to consider being on the right side of history by voting yes with no exemptions on the smokefree multi-unit housing ordinance.

---

I had spoken at least a few times remotely due to Covid restrictions but today makes the first in-person advocacy I did in front of the Vallejo City Council. I’m pleased to be working with LGBTQ Minus Tobacco in fighting for Vallejo to adopt a Smokefree Multi-Unit Housing Ordinance like our Solano County neighbor to the East, Benicia, and many other San Francisco Bay Area jurisdictions already have.

I find it particularly interesting that I accidentally shot the “No Smoking” decal on the door when I took this selfie, without even realizing it. I have the video of my speech available and had my daughter watch it. She and my husband were very proud. I’m sure I’ll be back to speak at City Council regularly, but so hoping this ordinance passes for the betterment of my city.

My new neighbor edited my article in the current Glen Cove Community Association newsletter. Funnily enough, he was introduced to me by friends in common at my birthday party earlier this month who realized we hadn’t met. We figured out soon after that he was the same guy who had been the president of GCCA and was still editing the newsletter, including my own article. However all the while with the article passing between us we did not know we had friends in common and that we were also both gay and would be meeting within days of finalizing the article!

This is a link to the issue with my article starting on page 6. I’m very proud to still be fighting Big Tobacco more than three decades after my father died at the very young age of fifty from smoking. His mother had died from smoking and drinking at the same age twenty years before him. I’ve now outlived them both.

Please check out LGBTQ Minus Tobacco‘s site as well. I recently learned about this organization through local political organizations. It was wonderful to find a local advocacy group that is fighting for a cause I’ve believed in for decades, especially since I specifically knew Big Tobacco targeted queer people long before I even came out to myself.